<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fiduciary Magazine &#187; Debits &amp; Credits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fiduciarymagazine.com/category/debits-credits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The 12 Most Oppressive Tax Countries</title>
		<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/07/03/the-12-most-oppressive-tax-countries/</link>
		<comments>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/07/03/the-12-most-oppressive-tax-countries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debits & Credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiduciarymagazine.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve got it bad in Los Angeles, but the US is 12th on the list. Italy is the worst, but then again, it is estimated that up to 40% of the &#8220;business&#8221; is done in cash. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve got it bad in Los Angeles, but <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/oppressive-tax-nations-2009-7#12-usa-1">the US is 12th on the list</a>. Italy is the worst, but then again, it is estimated that up to 40% of the &#8220;business&#8221; is done in cash. </p>
<script src="http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/~s/http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/?i=http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/07/03/the-12-most-oppressive-tax-countries/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/07/03/the-12-most-oppressive-tax-countries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unintended Consequences</title>
		<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/30/unintended-consequences/</link>
		<comments>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/30/unintended-consequences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debits & Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Dili]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiduciarymagazine.com/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Andre Peschong
Looking at the fallout on Wall Street, there has been great change in the financial industry and, in turn, some unintended consequences.  The hedge funds that once numbered over 7,000 (my unofficial estimate as I couldn’t find a substantiated number) are now pared down to around 3,000.  Venture Capital has retreated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dealflowdiaries.com/">By Andre Peschong</a></p>
<p>Looking at the fallout on Wall Street, there has been great change in the financial industry and, in turn, some unintended consequences.  The hedge funds that once numbered over 7,000 (my unofficial estimate as I couldn’t find a substantiated number) are now pared down to around 3,000.  Venture Capital has retreated to higher ground by doing larger deals and more 2nd, 3rd and 4th rounds into existing portfolio companies.  Private equity houses have largely been untouched, but they are suffering from the lack of exits.  Three of the largest investment banking firms have gone under or been absorbed by larger traditional banks. </p>
<p>What are the unintended consequences of this current market upheaval for the financial sector?  The most glaring one follows the first law of thermodynamics (and I paraphrase) which portends that nothing is ever created or destroyed but merely shifts forms.  The shift I am alluding to is the movement of talent and deals at these former large tier investment banking firms to new firms, or to more aggressive mid tier boutique investment banks or specialty M&#038;A houses. </p>
<p>This shift takes time, which is probably a contributing reason for the lack of IPO’s, PIPE transactions or any other type of liquidity events for the private equity/VC market. </p>
<p>Need proof? According to Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) the VC activity for the first quarter is down to levels not seen since 1997.  VC and private equity funds have to consider the types of deals and companies they are willing to invest in based primarily on the extended holding time.  The only current exit for a privately backed company is through an M&#038;A transaction and those deals will be done at increasingly smaller multiples as this is a buyers’ market.  The events of the past 12 months have really made professional investors and funds alike re-examine their investment model, pricing and exit strategies.  The unintended consequence of these events are a boon to M&#038;A boutiques that concentrate on buyside representation or that have top tier clients looking for bolt on acquisitions. </p>
<p>The market needs time to readjust to the new landscape in the capital markets.  Deals will be under much heavier scrutiny from all sides, the accountants, VC’s, private equity groups, valuation firms, investment banks etc.  This shift in due diligence on transactions will be significant.  There will be a natural growth of service providers bringing additional transparency to the “deal” business.  A true and needed unintended consequence.</p>
<script src="http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/~s/http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/?i=http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/30/unintended-consequences/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/30/unintended-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barry Ritholtz Podcast</title>
		<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/26/barry-ritholtz-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/26/barry-ritholtz-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debits & Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiduciarymagazine.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I interviewed Barry Ritholtz yesterday. Here is a link to the podast
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I interviewed Barry Ritholtz yesterday. <a href="http://martinkronicle.com/2009/06/26/barry-ritholtz/">Here is a link to the podast</a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/~s/http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/?i=http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/26/barry-ritholtz-podcast/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/26/barry-ritholtz-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When To Dump Your Funds</title>
		<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/22/when-to-dump-your-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/22/when-to-dump-your-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debits & Credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiduciarymagazine.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morningstar had an interesting article on managing risk. Problem with the author&#8217;s methodology is that it is way too subjective. People are emotional about money. You need to have a pre-determined &#8220;puke&#8221; point where you get out no matter what. You cannot make decisions about money on the spot. Remember: Price moves first, then the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morningstar had an <a href="http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=295256&#038;pgid=rss">interesting article on managing risk</a>. Problem with the author&#8217;s methodology is that it is way too subjective. People are emotional about money. You need to have a pre-determined &#8220;puke&#8221; point where you get out no matter what. You cannot make decisions about money on the spot. Remember: Price moves first, then the fundamentals follow. Unless you&#8217;re a CFA and do this for a living, take your small losses regularly and move on. </p>
<script src="http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/~s/http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/?i=http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/22/when-to-dump-your-funds/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/22/when-to-dump-your-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Relief Coming&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/17/tax-relief-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/17/tax-relief-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debits & Credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiduciarymagazine.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We need to modernize the laws to reflect the reality that cell phones, BlackBerrys and text messaging are an everyday extension of the workplace and are here to stay." Sen. John Kerry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://fiduciarymagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/kerry.jpg" alt="kerry" title="kerry" width="128" height="80" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-313" /><br />
Before we pay for the bailouts, as well as the $1,600 per family proposed carbon tax, the Government wants to help lessen the blow.</p>
<p>The IRS and the Treasury want to repeal the cell phone tax. The 1989 law says workers are supposed to count the value of personal calls on a a company cell phone as taxable income. </p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/IRS-Treasury-want-cell-phone-apf-15544845.html">Click here for the full article.</a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/~s/http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/?i=http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/17/tax-relief-coming/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/17/tax-relief-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citi Full Circle</title>
		<link>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/10/citi-full-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/10/citi-full-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debits & Credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiduciarymagazine.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, earlier this month quietly amended FAS 140, effective at the end of the year, eliminating qualified special purpose entities, or QSPEs. If you thought mark-to-market accounting changes had an effect on the banks, hold onto your hats.
The special purpose vehicles allow banks to stash things like asset-backed securities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, earlier this month quietly amended FAS 140, effective at the end of the year, eliminating qualified special purpose entities, or QSPEs. If you thought mark-to-market accounting changes had an effect on the banks, hold onto your hats.</p>
<p>The special purpose vehicles allow banks to stash things like asset-backed securities and other unwanted assets, reducing the amount of reserves they need to hold. The QSPEs also are a great way to hide losses.</p>
<p><strong>Citigroup</strong> <span class="TICKERFLAT">(<a href="http://www.thestreet.com/quote/C.html">C Quote</a>)</span> had $822 billion in QSPE exposure last year, according to its annual report. That&#8217;s tops among the four largest banks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdoqocy.com/d3106lnwtnvAEFKHIJIACBGKDKIB" target="_blank" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.chemistry.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;"><br />
<img src="http://www.awltovhc.com/i477r6Az42OSTYVWXWOQPUYRYWP" alt="3 Months for the Price of 1" border="0"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/mm79ar-xrzEIJOLMNMEGFLLJJMH" target="_blank" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.flyclear.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;"><br />
<img src="http://www.ftjcfx.com/6677qmqeki378DABCB354AA88B6" alt="Fly through Airport Security!" border="0"/></a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/~s/http://feeds.fiduciarymagazine.com/?i=http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/10/citi-full-circle/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fiduciarymagazine.com/2009/06/10/citi-full-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
